4.7 Article

Research Note: An overview on distribution of fowl adenoviruses

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101052

关键词

adenovirus; distribution; epidemiology; prevalence; chicken

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [NKFI-OTKA K120201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fowl adenoviruses (FAdV) from 38 countries were partially sequenced and classified, with FAdV-E and FAdV-D being the most common species. They are often associated with concurrent infections in poultry, including inclusion body hepatitis and hepatitis hydropericardium syndrome. Avian infectious bronchitis virus was the most frequent coinfection with all FAdV species.
Fowl adenoviruses (FAdV), detected during routine diagnostic investigations from 38 coun-tries (5 continents) over a decade, were partially sequenced and grouped by phylogenetic analysis. The partial polymerase gene nucleotide sequences of the 365 fowl adenovirus isolates resulted in the following species distribution: 11% FAdV-A; 3% FAdV-B; 2% FAdV-C; 34% FAdV-D; and 50% FAdV-E. Noticeably, only 79 of the detected strains could be associated with adenovirus-specific pathologic conditions: 62 (79%) with inclusion body hepatitis; 9 (11%) with gizzard erosion; and 8 (10%) with hepatitis hydropericardium syndrome. The remainder of the FAdV strains was detected as concomitant infection from other disease conditions almost exclusively in boilers of 27 to 42 d of age: the majority of them was FAdV-E followed by FAdV-D, and to a lesser extent of FAdV-A, B, and C, the latter ones have not been associated with any of the established adenovirus-caused syndromes in our collection. The highest ratio of coinfections was observed for FAdV-B (62%), while it was about 30% for the rest of the FAdV species. The most frequent coinfection, in connection with all FAdV species, was with the avian infectious bronchitis virus. The presented database will serve as the basis for comparative whole genome and cross-neutralization analysis of selected FAdV isolates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据