4.7 Article

Filler-polymer interaction investigated using graphitized carbon blacks: Another attempt to explain reinforcement

期刊

POLYMER
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123513

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between filler surface properties and compound properties, focusing on large-strain softening effects in EPDM filled with carbon blacks treated at different temperatures. The results suggest that the reinforcement effect is best explained by chemical filler-polymer bonds, while low-strain modulus and equilibrium hysteresis are influenced by physical compatibility.
Many theories on the origin of rubber reinforcement have been presented over the last decades. None of them explains beyond reasonable doubt why the dispersion of carbon black into a polymer matrix induces an immense improvement of ultimate properties. We present a throughout analysis of ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), filled with carbon blacks treated at temperatures between 900 degrees C and 2500 degrees C. The fillers are investigated extensively using static gas adsorption, transmission-electron microscopy and elemental analysis. Afterwards, correlations between filler surface properties of the filler and properties of the compounds are drawn with a special focus on large-strain softening effects (Mullins' softening). The latter successively vanishes with temperature treatment of carbon black. Moreover, the softened samples do not recover at temperatures below 100 degrees C or by swelling. A very simple model involving a stress-limiting process at the polymer-filler interface is derived, which reproduces the experimental results well. Equilibrium hysteresis is found to be originated in physical interaction only. It turns out that the softening-generating effect (reinforcement) is best explained by chemical filler-polymer bonds, successively breaking down during stretching, and low-strain modulus and equilibrium hysteresis by physical compatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据