4.8 Review

The current state and future directions of marine turtle toxicology research

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 113-123

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.013

关键词

Organic contaminants; Metals; Biomarkers; In vitro; In vivo; Risk assessment

资金

  1. Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  2. Griffith University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical contamination of marine turtles has been well documented in the literature, although information on the toxicological effects of these contaminants is poorly understood. This paper systematically and quantitatively presents the available marine turtle toxicological research (excluding oil chemicals and natural toxins) and the related fields of cell line establishment and biomarkers as indicators of exposure. Examination of the published literature identified a total of 49 papers on marine turtle toxicology, which were split into three categories: toxicity studies (n = 33, 67%), cell line establishment (n = 7, 14%), and publications using biomarkers (n = 13, 27%). Toxicity studies were further broken down into four subcategories: those correlating contaminants with toxicological endpoints (n = 16, 48%); in vitro exposure experiments (n = 11, 33%); in vivo exposure experiments (n = 5, 15%); and screening risk assessments using hazard quotients (n = 3, 9%). In quantitatively assessing the literature, trends and gaps in this field of research were identified. This paper highlights the need for more marine turtle toxicology research on all species, particularly using high throughput and non-invasive in vitro assays developed for marine turtle cells, including investigations into further toxicological endpoints and mixture effects. This will provide more comprehensive species-specific assessment of the impacts of chemical contaminants on these threatened animals, and improve conservation and management strategies globally. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据