4.6 Article

The impact of public coverage of newer hepatitis C medications on utilization, adherence, and costs in British Columbia

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247843

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Scheme Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-148412]
  2. Health Economics Studentship Award from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
  3. Canada Research Chair in Access to Medicines
  4. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award
  5. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award 2017 [16813]
  6. Amgen Canada
  7. AstraZeneca Canada
  8. Eli Lilly Canada
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Merck Canada
  11. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada
  12. Pfizer Canada
  13. Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
  14. Hoffman-La Roche
  15. LifeScan Canada
  16. Lundbeck Canada
  17. BC Centre for Disease Control
  18. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [NHC-348216, PHE337680, PJT-156066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After studying the impact of public prescription drug coverage for sofosbuvir and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in British Columbia, Canada, it was found that public coverage dramatically increased the use of these drugs without reducing adherence. Public expenditure increased following the policy change, crowding out some private expenditure.
Background Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir are both newer direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C. The high list prices for both drugs have led to concern about the budget impact for public drug coverage programs. Therefore, we studied the impact of public prescription drug coverage for both drugs on utilization, adherence, and public and private expenditure in British Columbia, Canada. Methods We used provincial administrative claims data from January 2014 to June 2017 for all individuals historically tested for either hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus. Using interrupted time series analysis, we examined the impact of public insurance coverage on treatment uptake, adherence (proportion of days covered), and public and private expenditures. Results Over our study period, 4,462 treatment initiations were eligible for analysis (1,131 sofosbuvir and 3,331 ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, which include 19 patients initiated on both treatments). We found the start of public coverage for sofosbuvir and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir increased treatment uptake by 154%. Adherence rates were consistently high and did not change with public coverage. Finally, public expenditure increased after the policy change, and crowded out some private expenditure. Conclusion Public coverage for high-cost drugs for hepatitis C dramatically increased use of these drugs, but did not reduce adherence. From a health policy perspective, public payers should be prepared for increased treatment uptake following the availability of public coverage. However, they should not be concerned that populations without private insurance coverage will be less adherent and not finish their treatment course.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据