4.6 Article

Encapsulation of Russian Olive Water Kefir as an Innovative Functional Drink with High Antioxidant Activity

期刊

PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 161-169

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11130-021-00886-8

关键词

Russian olive; Water kefir; Encapsulation; Spray drying; Optimization; Fermentation

资金

  1. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to encapsulate water kefir microorganisms and bioactive compounds in Russian olive water kefir to develop a synbiotic functional powder using spray drying, with optimal conditions observed at an inlet air temperature of 120°C, 35% feed flow rate, and 7% drying aid concentration. The physicochemical properties of the spray-dried powder showed promising characteristics compared to freeze-dried powder, indicating potential for use in commercial products.
Processing of Russian olive water kefir (RWK), as a fermented functional drink made with Russian olive juice and water kefir grains with high antioxidant activity, into powder is crucial for improving its stability for the commercialization of this product. For the first time, this study aimed to encapsulate water kefir microorganisms and bioactive compounds in RWK using carrier materials to develop a synbiotic functional powder using spray drying as an encapsulation method. The goal was maximizing antioxidant activity, product yield, and survival rate of water kefir microorganisms in the produced Russian olive water kefir powder. The optimal spray drying conditions were observed to be at an inlet air temperature of 120oC, 35 % feed flow rate, and 7 % concentration of drying aid. The effects of spray drying conditions on the quality of microcapsules were assessed and modeled, and the validity of the model was verified. Also, the spray-dried powder's physicochemical properties were assessed and showed promising microbial and physicochemical characteristics compared with the freeze-dried powder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据