4.7 Article

Piper nigrum extract attenuates food allergy by decreasing Th2 cell response and regulating the Th17/Treg balance

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 3214-3225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7034

关键词

food allergy; Piper nigrum extract; Th17; Th2; Treg

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803544]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Piper nigrum extract has a protective role in OVA-induced food allergy by inhibiting Th2 cell response and regulating the Th17/Treg balance.
Piper nigrum is extensively utilized because of its antioxidation, antiallergic, antitumor, antiinflammatory, antidiarrhea, and gastrointestinal protection. We attempted to indicate whether the Piper nigrum extract (PNE) could alleviate ovalbumin (OVA)-induced food allergy, and to explore its potential mechanism. An OVA-induced food allergy mouse model was established, and different concentrations of PNE were administrated. Symptoms of food allergy, levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE), mucosal mast cell protease-1 (mMCP-1), and intestine pathological changes were assessed. Additionally, the expressions of T helper (Th) 2, Th17 and regulatory T (Treg)-associated cytokines and the proportion of Th17 and Treg cells in CD4(+) T cells were measured. We found PNE attenuated symptoms of food allergy and decreased the levels of IgE and mMCP-1. In PNE group, the infiltration degree of inflammatory cells was ameliorated and the villi of small intestine were more complete. Moreover, the expressions of Th2 and Th17 cell-associated cytokines were down-regulated by PNE pretreatment, while the levels of Treg cell-associated cytokines were up-regulated. PNE decreased the number of Th17 cells, while increased the Tregs cells. PNE treatment dose-dependently improved the Th17/Treg balance. PNE plays a protective role in OVA-induced food allergy through inhibiting Th2 cell response and regulating the Th17/Treg balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据