4.5 Article

On exactly solvable ghost-ridden systems

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS A
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.127104

关键词

Higher-derivative systems; Exactly solvable systems; Toda; KdV; Ghosts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses exactly solvable systems involving integrals of motion with higher powers of momenta, where choosing one of these integrals as the Hamiltonian leads to the presence of ghosts, however, these ghosts are benign with no collapse and no violation of unitarity in the system.
We discuss exactly solvable systems involving integrals of motion with higher powers of momenta. If one of these integrals is chosen for the Hamiltonian, we obtain a system involving ghosts, i.e. a system whose Hamiltonian is not bounded neither from below, nor from above. However, these ghosts are benign: there is no collapse and unitarity is not violated. As an example, we consider the 3-particle Toda periodic chain, with the cubic invariant I chosen for the Hamiltonian. The classical trajectories exhibit regular oscillations, and the spectrum of the quantum Hamiltonian is discrete running from -cx to Do. We also discuss the classical dynamics of a perturbed system with the Hamiltonian H = I + v, where v is an oscillator potential. Such a system is not exactly solvable, but its classical trajectories exhibit not regular, but still benign behavior without collapse. This means that also the corresponding quantum problem is well defined. The same observation can be made for exactly solvable (1+1)-dimensional field theories involving an infinite number of conservation laws: any of them can be chosen for the Hamiltonian. We illustrate this for the Sine-Gordon and KdV models. In the latter case, the Lagrangian and standard integrals of motion involve higher spatial rather than temporal derivatives. But one can always interchange x and t, after which we obtain a system with benign ghosts. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据