4.6 Article

Test-Retest Reliability of the Mini-BESTest in People With Mild to Moderate Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

PHYSICAL THERAPY
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab045

关键词

Balance Control; Multiple Sclerosis; Outcome Measurement; Test-Retest Reliability

资金

  1. Doctoral School in Health Care Sciences
  2. NEURO Sweden
  3. Center for Innovative Medicine (CIMED) [SLL20190446]
  4. Karolinska Institutet-Region Stockholm
  5. Region Stockholm [SLL20180182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the mini-BESTest demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability and small measurement errors in people with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis. Knowledge of limits of agreement and minimal detectable change greatly contributes to the interpretability of the test, enhancing its clinical usefulness for evaluating balance control and designing customized balance training for individuals with MS.
Objective. The mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a balance measure for assessment of the underlying physiological systems for balance control in adults. Evaluations of test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest in larger samples of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest total and section sum scores and individual items in people with mild to moderate overall MS disability. Methods. This study used a test-retest design in a movement laboratory setting. Fifty-four people with mild to moderate overall MS disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were included, with 28 in the mild subgroup (EDSS 2.0-3.5) and 26 in the moderate subgroup (EDSS 4.0-5.5). Test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest was evaluated by repeated measurements taken 1 week apart. Reliability and measurement error were analyzed. Results. Test-retest reliability for the total scores was considered good to excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients of .88 for the whole sample, .83 for the mild MS subgroup, and .80 for the moderate MS subgroup. Measurement errors were small, with standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of 1.3 and 3.5, respectively, in mild MS, and 1.7 and 4.7, respectively, in moderate MS. The limits of agreement were -3.4 and 4.6. Test-retest reliability for the section scores were fair to good or excellent; weighted kappa values ranged from .62 to .83. All items but 1 showed fair to good or excellent test-retest reliability, and percentage agreement ranged from 61% to 100%. Conclusion. The mini-BESTest demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability and small measurement errors and is recommended for use in people with mild to moderate MS. Impact. Knowledge of limits of agreement and minimal detectable change contribute to the interpretability of the mini-BESTest total score. The findings of this study enhance the clinical usefulness of the test for evaluation of balance control and for designing individually customized balance training with high precision and accuracy in people with MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据