4.8 Article

Power Law Stretching of Associating Polymers in Steady-State Extensional Flow

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.057801

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. EPSRC [EP/N031431/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/N031431/2, EP/N031431/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tube model confirms analytical predictions for sticky diffusivity and shows a power law distribution of stretch in steady-state extensional flow. Strong stochastic forcing is found to be the driving factor behind the long tail of the distribution, leading to rare events of reaching a threshold stretch and offering insights into nucleation rates of flow-induced crystallization in systems of associating polymers under flow. The model also represents a wide class of driven systems with strong and scaling fluctuations.
We present a tube model for the Brownian dynamics of associating polymers in extensional flow. In linear response, the model confirms the analytical predictions for the sticky diffusivity by Leibler-Rubinstein-Colby theory. Although a single-mode Doi-Edwards-Marcucci-Grizzuti approximation accurately describes the transient stretching of the polymers above a sticky Weissenberg number (product of the strain rate with the sticky-Rouse time), the preaveraged model fails to capture a remarkable development of a power law distribution of stretch in steady-state extensional flow: while the mean stretch is finite, the fluctuations in stretch may diverge. We present an analytical model that shows how strong stochastic forcing drives the long tail of the distribution, gives rise to rare events of reaching a threshold stretch, and constitutes a framework within which nucleation rates of flow-induced crystallization may be understood in systems of associating polymers under flow. The model also exemplifies a wide class of driven systems possessing strong, and scaling, fluctuations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据