4.8 Article

Measurement of Conduction and Valence Bands g-Factors in a Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayer

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.067403

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche funding ANR 2D-vdW-Spin
  2. ANR VallEx
  3. ANR MagicValley
  4. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0014349]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014349] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a new method to access the respective contributions of conduction and valence bands to the Zeeman splitting in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides, providing valuable input parameters for band structure calculations of these 2D materials.
The electron valley and spin degree of freedom in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides can be manipulated in optical and transport measurements performed in magnetic fields. The key parameter for determining the Zeeman splitting, namely, the separate contribution of the electron and hole g factor, is inaccessible in most measurements. Here we present an original method that gives access to the respective contribution of the conduction and valence band to the measured Zeeman splitting. It exploits the optical selection rules of exciton complexes, in particular the ones involving intervalley phonons, avoiding strong renormalization effects that compromise single particle g-factor determination in transport experiments. These studies yield a direct determination of single band g factors. We measure g(c1) = 0.86 +/- 0.1, g(c2) = 3.84 +/- 0.1 for the bottom (top) conduction bands and g(v) = 6.1 +/- 0.1 for the valence band of monolayer WSe2. These measurements are helpful for quantitative interpretation of optical and transport measurements performed in magnetic fields. In addition, the measured g factors are valuable input parameters for optimizing band structure calculations of these 2D materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据