4.3 Article

Nature and Shape of Stacking Faults in 3C-SiC by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202000598

关键词

defect characterization; dislocation annihilation; electronic properties; molecular dynamics; Shockley partial dislocation; silicon carbide; stacking faults

资金

  1. EU [720827]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the evolution of single PD loops releasing tensile strain during the initial carbonization stage leads to the formation of experimentally observed V- or Delta-shaped SFs, while nucleation in the adjacent planes of PD loops occurs at a later stage of 3C-SiC deposition under slightly compressive-strain conditions. This process efficiently decreases the elastic energy of the 3C-SiC crystal by forming triple SFs with common boundaries made up by PD loops yielding a zero total Burgers vector.
Classical molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate the 3D evolution of stacking faults (SFs), including the partial dislocation (PD) loops enclosing them, during growth of 3C-SiC layers on Si(001). It is shown that the evolution of single PD loops releasing tensile strain during the initial carbonization stage, commonly preceding 3C-SiC deposition, leads to the formation of experimentally observed V- or Delta-shaped SFs, the key role being played by the differences in the mobilities between Si- and C-terminated PD segments. Nucleation in the adjacent planes of PD loops takes place at later stage of 3C-SiC deposition, when slightly compressive-strain conditions are present. It is shown that such a process very efficiently decreases the elastic energy of the 3C-SiC crystal. The maximum energy decrease is obtained via the formation of triple SFs with common boundaries made up by PD loops yielding a zero total Burgers vector. Obtained results explain the experimentally observed relative abundance of compact microtwin regions in 3C-SiC layers as compared with the other SF-related defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据