4.6 Article

Multi-pulse solitary waves in a fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger equation

期刊

PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2021.132890

关键词

Nonlinear Schrodinger equation; Solitary waves; Multi-pulse solutions; Nonlinear optics

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation under the RTG grant [DMS-1840260, DMS-1909559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the existence and spectral stability of multi-pulse solitary wave solutions to a nonlinear Schrodinger equation with both fourth and second-order dispersion terms are considered. A criterion for the existence of a single solitary wave solution is provided, and a discrete family of multi-pulse solutions is shown to exist. The spectral stability problem for these multi-pulses is reduced to computing the determinant of a matrix, leading to the conclusion that all multi-pulses are spectrally unstable.
In the present work, we consider the existence and spectral stability of multi-pulse solitary wave solutions to a nonlinear Schrodinger equation with both fourth and second-order dispersion terms. We first give a criterion for the existence of a single solitary wave solution in terms of the coefficients of the dispersion terms, and then show that a discrete family of multi-pulse solutions exists which is characterized by the distances between the individual pulses. We then reduce the spectral stability problem for these multi-pulses to computing the determinant of a matrix which is, to leading order, block diagonal. Under additional assumptions, which can be verified numerically and are sufficient to prove orbital stability of the primary solitary wave, we show that all multi-pulses are spectrally unstable. Numerical computations for the spectra of double pulses are presented which are in good agreement with our analytical results. Results of timestepping simulations are also provided to characterize the nature of these instabilities. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据