4.5 Article

Structural, electronic and optical properties of two-dimensional Janus transition metal oxides MXO (M = Ti, Hf and Zr; X = S and Se) for photovoltaic and opto-electronic applications

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 604, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412621

关键词

Oxide semiconductors; 2D materials; Electronic properties; Absorption coefficient; Density functional theory

资金

  1. Project PPR2: (MESRSF-CNRST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the structural, electronic and optical properties of Janus MXO (M = Ti, Hf and Zr; X = S and Se) mono-layers using density functional theory calculations. The results show strong absorption coefficient and low reflectivity in the visible and ultraviolet regions, making them potential candidates for opto-electronic and photovoltaic applications.
Two-dimensional Janus transition metal dichalcogenides structures have drawn increasing importance due to their remarkable properties for versatile applications in optoelectronic, photo-catalytic, thermo-electricity, piezoelectricity and spintronic. In this Paper, by employing the Ab-initio computations based on the density functional theory, the structural, electronic and optical properties of Janus MXO (M = Ti, Hf and Zr; X = S and Se) mono-layers are investigated utilizing full potential linearized augmented plane waves (FP-LAPW) method. The lattice parameters of the six Janus were computed, which are close to the previous theoretical results. The density of states and the electronic band structures were investigated for the first time using (GGA-PBE) approximation for the potential of the exchange and correlation. The optical parameters like complex dielectric function, refractive index, reflectivity, extinction and absorption coefficients of all Janus were performed. Our results reveal strong absorption coefficient and low reflectivity in the visible and ultraviolet regions, which make them candidates for opto-electronic and photovoltaic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据