4.6 Article

Correlated cluster mean-field theory for Ising-like spin systems

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.125884

关键词

Mean field; Critical temperature; Correlations

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Capes), Brazil
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Fapergs), Brazil
  4. Programa de Educacao Tutorial (PET), Brazil scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The correlated cluster mean-field (CCMF) theory is an approximate method that has been applied to study spin-1/2 Hamiltonians and extended to Ising-like systems with spin S > 1/2. Research shows that the CCMF method results on honeycomb, square, and simple cubic lattices can be compared to state-of-the-art methods, and applications for higher spin and mixed-spin systems on the honeycomb lattice have been compared with other techniques. Results indicate that the reduced critical temperature obtained within the CCMF theory overestimates by only 5% the exact result for the mixed spin-(1, 1/2) system.
The correlated cluster mean-field (CCMF) theory is an approximative method that have been applied to the study of spin-1/2 Hamiltonians, providing accurate results for several magnetic systems. In this paper, we review the method applications and extend its framework to the study of Ising-like systems with spin S > 1/2. Our investigation of the spin-1 ferromagnet on honeycomb, square and simple cubic lattices showed that the CCMF method results can be compared to state-of-the-art methods. We also present the method application for higher spin (3/2 <= S <= 5/2) and mixed-spin systems on the honeycomb lattice, comparing our findings with other techniques. As a result, the reduced critical temperature obtained within the CCMF theory overestimates by only 5% the exact result for the mixed spin-(1, 1/2) system. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据