4.5 Article

Is complex fault zone behaviour a reflection of rheological heterogeneity?

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0421

关键词

faults; shear zones; rheology; earthquakes; creep

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [715836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the range of fault slip speeds and geological descriptions, focusing on the degree of fault zone heterogeneity and its effects. Intermediate slip speeds may arise due to a combination of factors, influenced by fault properties and other dynamic variables.
Fault slip speeds range from steady plate boundary creep through to earthquake slip. Geological descriptions of faults range from localized displacement on one or more discrete planes, through to distributed shearing flow in tabular zones of finite thickness, indicating a large range of possible strain rates in natural faults. We review geological observations and analyse numerical models of two-phase shear zones to discuss the degree and distribution of fault zone heterogeneity and effects on active fault slip style. There must be certain conditions that produce earthquakes, creep and slip at intermediate velocities. Because intermediate slip styles occur over large ranges in temperature, the controlling conditions must be effects of fault properties and/or other dynamic variables. We suggest that the ratio of bulk driving stress to frictional yield strength, and viscosity contrasts within the fault zone, are critical factors. While earthquake nucleation requires the frictional yield to be reached, steady viscous flow requires conditions far from the frictional yield. Intermediate slip speeds may arise when driving stress is sufficient to nucleate local frictional failure by stress amplification, or local frictional yield is lowered by fluid pressure, but such failure is spatially limited by surrounding shear zone stress heterogeneity. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Understanding earthquakes using the geological record'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据