4.5 Review

Incorporating climate change in flood estimation guidance

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0548

关键词

flooding; climate change; flood estimation; engineering; design

资金

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP200101326]
  3. US Army Corps of Engineers' Institute for Water Resources (IWR)
  4. Universidad de Costa Rica's Office of International Affairs and External Cooperation
  5. Newcastle University's School of Engineering
  6. Hydro Tasmania
  7. Melbourne Water
  8. Murray-Darling Basin Authority
  9. Queensland Department of Natural Resources Mines and Energy
  10. Seqwater
  11. Snowy Hydro
  12. Sunwater
  13. West Australian Water Corporation
  14. WaterNSW
  15. INTENSE [ERC-2013-CoG-617329]
  16. FUTURE-STORMS [NE/R01079X/1]
  17. FUTURE-DRAINAGE [NE/S017348/1]
  18. Wolfson Foundation
  19. Royal Society [WM140025]
  20. NERC [NE/R01079X/1, NE/S017348/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on the implications of climate change on flood hazard has progressed significantly in the past decade, but efforts to translate this research into practical guidance for flood estimation are still in their early stages. Although climate science involves varying levels of uncertainty, many jurisdictions worldwide have started incorporating climate change into their flood guidance, signaling the need for more flexible design and planning approaches.
Research into potential implications of climate change on flood hazard has made significant progress over the past decade, yet efforts to translate this research into practical guidance for flood estimation remain in their infancy. In this commentary, we address the question: how best can practical flood guidance be modified to incorporate the additional uncertainty due to climate change? We begin by summarizing the physical causes of changes in flooding and then discuss common methods of design flood estimation in the context of uncertainty. We find that although climate science operates across aleatory, epistemic and deep uncertainty, engineering practitioners generally only address aleatory uncertainty associated with natural variability through standards-based approaches. A review of existing literature and flood guidance reveals that although research efforts in hydrology do not always reflect the methods used in flood estimation, significant progress has been made with many jurisdictions around the world now incorporating climate change in their flood guidance. We conclude that the deep uncertainty that climate change brings signals a need to shift towards more flexible design and planning approaches, and future research effort should focus on providing information that supports the range of flood estimation methods used in practice. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes and implications for flash flood risks'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据