4.4 Article

Tensorial permeability microstructure model considering crystallographic texture and grain size for evaluation of magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline steels

期刊

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
卷 101, 期 10, 页码 1224-1244

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2021.1892229

关键词

Permeability tensor; finite element; microstructure; crystallographic texture; steels

资金

  1. Research Fund for Coal and Steel [847296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A finite element microstructure model based on magnetic domain theory has been developed to evaluate magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline steels, considering crystallographic texture and grain size. The model accurately captures the effects of crystallographic texture, grain size, and vector induction on effective permeability behaviors. Predicted magnetic properties allow for quantitative characterization of magnetic anisotropy, while effective permeability maps visually indicate crystallographic texture from magnetic values. These features have been experimentally validated against commercial grain oriented electrical steel with strong texture and magnetic anisotropy.
A finite element microstructure model with permeability tensors that considers crystallographic texture and grain size based on magnetic domain theory has been developed for the evaluation of magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline steels. The model has proved capable of capturing the crystallographic texture, the grain size and the vector induction effects on the effective permeability behaviours for typical textures in steels. The predicted magnetic properties as a function of the magnetic field direction enables a quantitative characterisation of the magnetic anisotropy. The predicted effective permeability maps can serve as a visual indication of the crystallographic texture from magnetic values. These features have been experimentally validated against a commercial grain oriented electrical steel featuring strong texture and magnetic anisotropy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据