4.3 Article

Evolution of stamen dimetrism in Melastomataceae, a large radiation of pollen flowers

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppees.2021.125589

关键词

Buzz pollination; Stamen dimorphism; Heteranthery; Pollen flowers; Selective pressure; Trait evolution

资金

  1. FAPEMIG [APQ02497-16]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior Brazil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that stamen dimetrism appeared multiple times in evolutionary history and is correlated with floral size, with lineages dependent on pollinators evolving the highest stamen dimetrism. The evolutionary lability of stamen dimetrism has likely contributed to maintaining the buzz pollination adaptive plateau in pollen flowers.
Changes in floral traits across evolutionary time are expected in response to selective pressures imposed by pollinators. Stamen dimetrism (here defined as size differences between stamens within the same flower) represents an important strategy to decrease pollen loss during bee-flower interactions in pollen flowers. However, the evolutionary history of stamen dimetrism, and the links between this and other reproductive traits across long periods of time are still poorly understood. Here we investigate the evolution of stamens dimetrism and the evolutionary correlation of this trait and other floral structures and reproductive strategies in Melastomataceae. Floral traits were scored from 336 species and reproductive biology data was gathered for 81 species. Stamen dimetrism is a labile trait, appeared several times throughout the evolutionary history of this Glade and is evolutionarily correlated to floral size. Among the 81 species analyzed, we observed that the lineages that depend on pollinators to reproduce correspond to those that evolved the highest stamen dimetrism. The evolutionary lability of stamen dimetrism has probably contributed to the maintenance of the buzz pollination adaptive plateau in possibly the largest radiation of pollen flowers in angiosperms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据