4.7 Article

Multi-objective adaptive differential evolution for SVM/SVR hyperparameters selection

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107649

关键词

Support vector machines; Parameters selection problem; Multi-objective optimization; Differential evolution; Adaptive parameters strategy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a multiobjective metaheuristic, APMT-MODE, for addressing the parameters selection problem in SVM and SVR, which is capable of providing more accurate and straightforward solutions under simple kernel functions and has been successfully applied in a real case study.
Parameters Selection Problem (PSP) is a relevant and complex optimization issue in Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), looking for obtaining an optimal set of hyperparameters. In our case, the optimization problem is addressed to obtain models that minimize the number of support vectors and maximize generalization capacity. However, to obtain accurate and low complexity solutions, defining an adequate kernel function and the SVM/SVR's hyperparameters are necessary, which currently represents a relevant research topic. To tackle this problem, this work proposes a multiobjective metaheuristic named Adaptive Parameter control with Mutant Tournament Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (APMT-MODE). Its performance is first tested in a series of benchmarks for classification and regression problems using simple kernels such as Gaussian and polynomial kernels. In both cases, the APMT-MODE is able to yield more precise and more straightforward solutions using simple kernels. Then, the approach is used on a real case study to create a welding bead depth and width SVR models for a Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) process. Additionally, a study on kernel functions was developed in terms of computational effort, aiming to assess its performance for embedded systems applications. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据