4.5 Letter

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurofibromatosis clinical care and research

期刊

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01711-w

关键词

COVID-19; Clinical care; Research; Rare disease; Neurofibromatosis; Telehealth; Telemedicine

资金

  1. Children's Tumor Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted NF care and research, with changes in clinician roles, decreased patient volumes, and widespread adoption of telehealth. Providers report high satisfaction with telehealth but express concerns about the inability to conduct physical examinations.
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had unprecedented impact on the provision of medical care for genetic disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the pandemic on neurofibromatosis (NF) care and research. Methods: Sixty-three United States NF clinics were surveyed to identify the impact of the pandemic on clinician role, patient volume, continuity of guideline-driven surveillance, research protocols, and use of (and satisfaction with) telehealth for the delivery of NF care. Results: Fifty-two clinic directors or their representatives completed the survey (83% response rate). About 2/3 of the clinics reported a greater than 50% decrease in the number of available patient appointments, and modified clinical surveillance and research protocols. Fifty-one clinics (98%) newly instituted telehealth during the pandemic. Barriers to telehealth prior to the pandemic were insurance reimbursement concerns and lack of infrastructure. Since telehealth was initiated, high provider satisfaction was reported with ease of use. The most common area of concern was related to inability to perform a physical examination. Conclusion: Results show marked impacts on NF care and research since the beginning of the pandemic, with potential long-term changes related to the introduction (or adoption) of telehealth for clinical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据