4.2 Article

Uncertainties of deformable image registration for dose accumulation of high-dose regions in bladder and rectum in locally advanced cervical cancer

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 953-962

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.08.011

关键词

Deformable image registration; Deformable dose accumulation; Cervix brachytherapy

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Danish Council for Strategic Research
  3. CIRRO-the Lundbeck Foundation Center for Interventional Research in Radiation Oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To compare the dose accumulation for bladder and rectum by deformable image registration (DIR) and direct addition (DA) of dose volume histogram parameters in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). Two DIR algorithms, contour- and intensity-based, also have been analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients (n = 21) treated with IGABT for carcinoma cervix under the IntErnational study on MRI-guided BRachytherapy in locally Advanced CErvical cancer protocol were analyzed. Each patient underwent two HDR-BT applications, 1-week apart with two fractions of 7 Gy each delivered per application. For each application, magnetic resonance imaging, volume delineation, reconstruction, treatment planning (BT1 and BT2), and dose evaluation were carried out. BT1 and BT2 images were registered using an intensity-based DIR, followed by deformable dose accumulation (DDA), which was then compared with DA. To compare the intensity-based DIR to other DIR approaches, nine patients were further evaluated using an in-house contour-based DIR algorithm for bladder dose accumulation. RESULTS: Mean ( standard deviation; range) percentage variation between DA and DDA was found to be 2.4% (+/-3.3;-1.8, 11.5) and 5.2% (+/-5.1;-1.7, 16.5) for the rectum and bladder, respectively. The differences between the DA and DDA were found to be statistically significant for both rectum (p = 0.008) and bladder (p = 0.0003). Intensity-based DIR algorithm resulted in a larger mean deviation between DDA and DA as compared with contour-based DIR, although statistically insignificant (p = 0.32). The difference between DDA and DA was 2.4 +/- 2.0% and 1.3 +/- 1.2%, for intensity-and contour-based DIR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DA of dose volume histogram parameters provides a good estimate to the dose to the organs at risk; DIR based on image intensities may lead to systematic underestimation of dose due to implausible DIR. (C) 2015 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据