4.6 Article

Dual modal plasmonic substrates based on a convective self-assembly technique for enhancement in SERS and LSPR detection

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 6179-6187

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.419051

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C2091068]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C2091068] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a dual modal plasmonic substrate combining SERS and LSPR detection was evaluated using a CSA method, showing high sensitivity and excellent reproducibility. The detection sensitivity for IgG was improved by over 211% compared to a conventional gold film. The synergistic SERS-LSPR approach based on CSA could provide a sensitive, reliable, and reproducible dual modal detection for various applications.
In this study, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) scheme is combined with localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) detection on a thin gold film with stripe patterns of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) via convective self-assembly (CSA) method. The potential of dual modal plasmonic substrates was evaluated by binding 4-ABT and IgG analytes, respectively. SERS experiments presented not only a high sensitivity with a detection limit of 4.7 nM and an enhancement factor of 1.34 x 10(5), but an excellent reproducibility with relative standard deviation of 5.5%. It was found from plasmonic sensing experiments by immobilizing IgG onto GNP-mediated gold film that detection sensitivity was improved by more than 211%, compared with a conventional bare gold film. Our synergistic SERS-LSPR approach based on a simple and cost-effective CSA method could open a route for sensitive, reliable and reproducible dual modal detection to expand the application areas. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据