4.5 Article

Large and controlled Goos-Hanchen shift in monolayer graphene covered multilayer photonic crystals grating

期刊

OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 483, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126606

关键词

GH shift; Graphene; Multilayer photonic crystals; Grating

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11774179]
  2. Jiangsu Specially Appointed Professor Plan, China [RK033STP16002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20161513, BK20150825]
  4. Six Categories of Summit Talents of Jiangsu Province of China [2016-JNHB-060]
  5. Training program of the Key and Major Research plan of NUPT, China [NY217166]
  6. NUPTSF [NY215027]
  7. Major Program of Natural Science Foundation by the Ministry of Education of China [TJ215009]
  8. 1311 Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the structure design, enhanced and controlled Goos-Hanchen shift of monolayer graphene can be achieved, providing a new way to realize novel optoelectric devices.
Enhancing and engineering the Goos-Hanchen (GH) shift of two dimensional layered materials provides a powerful way to realize the novel optoelectric devices. Here we report an enhanced and controlled GH shift in the hybrid structure consisting of monolayer graphene and multilayer photonic crystals grating structure by using the rigorous coupled-wave analysis and stationary phase method, whose value can reach up to more than two thousand times of incident wavelength. Such an enhanced GH shift can be ascribed to the excitation of the guide mode resonances in the multilayer photonic crystal grating structure. In addition, the various geometrical parameters of the hybrid structure allow for the control of the GH shift in monolayer graphene based multilayer photonic crystal grating structure. Our work highlights the possibility of improving the performance of the GH shift of monolayer graphene by well designing the structures, which is essential for the optoelectronic sensors and detectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据