4.7 Article

Polymer like response of muscovite upon 515 nm femtosecond laser pulse processing

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106641

关键词

Femtosecond laser processing; Muscovite mica; Laser surface patterning; Laser mineral processing

资金

  1. Australian Government international Research Training Program stipend
  2. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that muscovite exhibits a polymer-like response when irradiated with a laser pulse at 515 nm wavelength, forming cavitation and bubbling similar to previous observations in polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA). Additionally, an absorption band edge for muscovite was reported at around 4 eV, lower than the previously reported band gap energy of 7.8 eV.
Muscovite, a nanolayered transparent crystalline dielectric, is shown to respond like a polymer upon irradiation with a single 190 fs duration laser pulse, at a wavelength of 515 nm, for a range of fluences (1.4-6.4 J/cm(2)). Laser-pulse-modified sites were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Cavitation and bubbling are observed in the laser processed region similar to previous observations in polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA). The diameter of these sites is consistent with the standard model commonly applied in laser ablation studies. These polymer-like results at 515 nm are in contrast to the response of muscovite exposed to a 150-fs single laser pulse at 800 nm for a similar range of fluences. Where a diverse range of topologies was observed as the fluence was increased. Additionally, we also report an absorption band edge at similar to 4 eV (for the muscovite sheet used in the study). This is lower than the previously reported band gap energy value of 7.8 eV. We propose that the differences observed at the two wavelengths are primarily due to either 2 or 3 photons being required for nonlinear photoionization and the impact of the mineral water content of muscovite (4.7 wt%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据