4.7 Article

Dynamics augmentation for high speed flying yacht hulls through PID control of foiling appendages

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108115

关键词

PID control; Foiling; Flying yacht; Lumped parameters model; Hydrodynamic performances; Ocean waves

资金

  1. University of Bologna, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical study was conducted to identify a PID control loop feedback scheme that can enhance the dynamics and seakeeping characteristics of high-speed flying yacht hulls. The study extended an existing lumped parameters model based on unsteady equations of motion and combined it with a regular ocean waves model to predict the performance of a specific engine-propelled flying yacht in calm and rough waters. The results showed the impact of using PID controllers on seakeeping performance and dynamics augmentation in dynamic systems.
A numerical investigation is conducted in order to identify a PID control loop feedback scheme able to return dynamics augmentation and superior seakeeping characteristics in the application of high speed flying yacht hulls. An existing lumped parameters model based on general unsteady equations of motion is extended and implemented in combination with a regular basic ocean waves model, to conduct parametric studies and predict the overall performances of a specific engine-propelled flying yacht hull, both in calm and rough water conditions. The unsteady behavior of six foiling/maneuvering appendages is investigated, the hydrodynamic characteristics being based on a database generated through the use of computational fluid dynamics methods (CFD) coupled with static/dynamic-mesh schemes. Equations of motion and hydrodynamics are solved numerically by explicit time-integration method. By comparison with control open-loop conditions, the results show the effects of the use of PID controllers in such dynamic systems in terms of seakeeping performances and dynamics augmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据