4.5 Article

Real-world outcomes with different technology modalities in type 1 diabetes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.028

关键词

Type 1 diabetes; Continuous glucose monitoring; Sensor-augmented pump; Hybrid closed-loop systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the real-world benefits of different treatment modalities for T1D. Results showed that HCL offers the maximum benefit in terms of maintaining time in range and protecting against hypoglycemia.
Background and aims: Several treatment modalities are available for type 1 diabetes (T1D), including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with MDI, sensor-augmented pumps with predictive low-glucose suspend function (SAP-PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop systems (HCL). The aim of the study was to evaluate the real-world benefits obtained with these treatment modalities. Methods and results: A cross-sectional study was performed, selecting 4 groups of T1D subjects, regarding their treatment modalities, paired by age, sex and diabetes duration. A comparison was performed, concerning time in different glucose ranges in 2-week sensor downloads. Estimated HbA1c, glycaemic variability measures and sensor use were also compared. 302 T1D people were included (age: 39 +/- 12 years, 47% male, diabetes duration: 21 +/- 10 years, estimated HbA1c: 7.28 +/- 0.84% (56 +/- 9 mmol/mol), baseline HbA1c: 7.4 +/- 1.0% (57 +/- 11 mmol/ mol), length of use of the device 8 [3-21] months). Group 1 (CGM + MDI) and 2 (FGM + MDI) showed no differences in time in different glucose ranges. Group 4 (HCL) showed a higher time 70-180 mg/dl and a lower time in hypoglycaemia than group 3 (SAP-PLGS). Group 1 and 2 showed lower time 70-180 mg/dl, higher time in hyperglycaemia and higher glycaemic variability measures than group 3. Group 4 was superior to groups 1 and 2 in all the outcomes. Conclusion: Real-life achievements in glycaemic control and glycaemic variability are described. HCL offer the maximum benefit in terms of time in range and hypoglycaemia protection, compared to CGM + MDI, FGM + MDI and SAP-PLGS. (c) 2021 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据