4.7 Article

Strength model for end cover separation failure in RC beams strengthened with near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP strips

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 222-232

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.049

关键词

End cover separation; Finite element analysis; FRP strengthening; Near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP; RC beams; Strength model

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB026201]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [PolyU 5315/09E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an alternative to externally bonded FRP reinforcement, near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP reinforcement can be used to effectively improve the flexural performance of RC beams. In such FRP-strengthened RC beams, end cover separation failure is one of the common failure modes. This failure mode involves the detachment of the NSM FRP reinforcement together with the concrete cover along the level of the tension steel reinforcement. This paper presents a new strength model for end cover separation failure in RC beams strengthened in flexure with NSM FRP strips (i.e. rectangular FRP bars with a sectional height-to-thickness ratio not less than 5), which was formulated on the basis of extensive numerical results from a parametric study undertaken using an efficient finite element approach. The proposed strength model consists of an approximate equation for the debonding strain of the FRP reinforcement at the critical cracked section and a conventional section analysis to relate this debonding strain to the moment acting on the same section (i.e. the debonding strain). Once the debonding strain is known, the load level at end cover separation of an FRP-strengthened RC beam can be easily determined for a given load distribution. Predictions from the proposed strength model are compared with those of two existing strength models of the same type and available test results, which shows that the proposed strength model is in close agreement with test results and is far more accurate than the existing strength models. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据