4.8 Article

A benchmark and an algorithm for detecting germline transposon insertions and measuring de novo transposon insertion frequencies

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [31871296]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HD078253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transposons, as genomic parasites, can cause instability and drive evolution in host genomes. TEMP2 is a new method that achieves high sensitivity and precision in detecting and measuring new transposon insertions in eukaryotic genomes.
Transposons are genomic parasites, and their new insertions can cause instability and spur the evolution of their host genomes. Rapid accumulation of short-read whole-genome sequencing data provides a great opportunity for studying new transposon insertions and their impacts on the host genome. Although many algorithms are available for detecting transposon insertions, the task remains challenging and existing tools are not designed for identifying de novo insertions. Here, we present a new benchmark fly dataset based on PacBio long-read sequencing and a new method TEMP2 for detecting germline insertions and measuring de novo 'singleton' insertion frequencies in eukaryotic genomes. TEMP2 achieves high sensitivity and precision for detecting germline insertions when compared with existing tools using both simulated data in fly and experimental data in fly and human. Furthermore, TEMP2 can accurately assess the frequencies of de novo transposon insertions even with high levels of chimeric reads in simulated datasets; such chimeric reads often occur during the construction of short-read sequencing libraries. By applying TEMP2 to published data on hybrid dysgenic flies inflicted by de-repressed P-elements, we confirmed the continuous new insertions of P-elements in dysgenic offspring before they regain piRNAs for P-element repression. TEMP2 is freely available at Github: https://github.com/weng- lab/TEMP2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据