4.1 Review

Extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: multimodality image evaluation

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 583-591

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001380

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; extrahepatic metastases; molecular imaging

资金

  1. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC) [2151 003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HCC survival has improved due to better primary tumor control and development of newer treatment modalities, with imaging techniques playing a crucial role in diagnosis and therapy assessment. Molecular imaging tools such as radiolabeled deoxyglucose and fluorocholine have shown promising value as complementary tools to conventional imaging, guiding treatment planning for patients.
The most prevalent primary malignancy of the liver is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); its poor prognosis is mainly related to intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic metastases. However, survival from HCC has improved due to better control of the primary tumor, the development of newer treatment modalities, including liver transplant, together with advances in imaging techniques. Therefore, the significance of patient management as corresponds with distant metastases has increased; since the proper evaluation and detection of extrahepatic metastases is crucial to optimize potential therapy for patients. Conventional imaging like CT, MRI play crucial rule in patient's diagnosis and qualifying for a certain type of therapy. More recently, a molecular imaging tool with radiolabeled deoxyglucose and fluorocholine has proved its promising value as a complementary tool to conventional studies. In this review, the frequent sites of metastases and HCC spread are discussed as well as the imaging findings as seen by both conventional imaging techniques and by molecular imaging tools, namely F-18-Choline PET/CT, and FDG PET. The implications of guiding treatment planning have also been discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据