4.3 Article

A reassessment of the quasi-simultaneous arrival effect in secondary ion mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2021.01.007

关键词

SIMS

资金

  1. NASA, USA [NNX14AF22G]
  2. NASA [NNX14AF22G, 684387] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) effects in secondary ion mass spectrometry can introduce mass-independent inaccuracies in isotope measurements. The Poisson statistical model is insufficient to explain most experimental data, and a closer examination using pulse-height distributions (PHDs) and time-series measurements reveals inconsistencies with the Poisson model. Corrections for QSA using an emission-transmission-detection model are complex, with standards-based correction being the most practical approach to minimize inaccuracies.
Quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) effects in secondary ion mass spectrometry can create mass-independent inaccuracies in isotope measurements when using electron multiplier detectors (EMs). The simple Poisson statistical model of QSA does not explain most experimental data. We present pulse-height distributions (PHDs) and time-series measurements to better study QSA. Our data show that PHDs and the distribution of multiple arrivals on the EM are not consistent with the Poisson model. Multiple arrivals are over-dispersed compared to Poisson and are closer to a negative binomial distribution. Through an emission-transmission-detection model we show that the QSA correction depends on the non-Poisson emission of multiple secondary ions, the secondary ion energy distribution, and other factors, making an analytical correction impractical. A standards-based correction for QSA is the best approach, and we show the proper way to calculate standards-normalized.. values to minimize the effect of QSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据