4.6 Article

Nonlocal generalized quantum measurements of bipartite spin products without maximal entanglement

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/abee3f

关键词

quantum measurements; quantum entanglement; generalized quantum measurements

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18J10639]
  2. MEXT Quantum Leap Flagship Program (MEXT Q-LEAP) [JPMXS0118067581]
  3. Tohoku University Division for Interdisciplinary Advanced Research and Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measuring a nonlocal observable on a space-like separated quantum system is described as a challenging task. This study presents a new method to achieve this without necessarily requiring a maximally-entangled ancilla, opening up possibilities for more economical nonlocal measurements with applications in various fields. The explicit relationship between measurement strength and the amount of ancillary entanglement needed provides a new perspective on the connections between quantum nonlocality, entanglement, and information transmission.
Measuring a nonlocal observable on a space-like separated quantum system is a resource-hungry and experimentally challenging task. Several theoretical measurement schemes have already been proposed to increase its feasibility, using a shared maximally-entangled ancilla. We present a new approach to this problem, using the language of generalized quantum measurements, to show that it is actually possible to measure a nonlocal spin product observable without necessarily requiring a maximally-entangled ancilla. This approach opens the door to more economical arbitrary-strength nonlocal measurements, with applications ranging from nonlocal weak values to possible new tests of Bell inequalities. The relation between measurement strength and the amount of ancillary entanglement needed is made explicit, bringing a new perspective on the links that tie quantum nonlocality, entanglement and information transmission together.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据