4.7 Review

The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: A meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 291-306

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.020

关键词

Neurofeedback; Neuromodulation; Real-time fMRI; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Psychiatric illness; Psychopathology; Intervention; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [1L30MH117569-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A meta-analysis of rtfMRI-NF for psychiatric disorders shows that it has a positive impact on brain activity during training, a large effect after training without feedback, and small effects on behavioral outcomes. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms, target population, and conditions of rtfMRI-NF.
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-NF) has gained popularity as an experimental treatment for a variety of psychiatric illnesses. However, there has yet to be a quantitative review regarding its efficacy. Here, we present the first meta-analysis of rtfMRI-NF for psychiatric disorders, evaluating its impact on brain and behavioral outcomes. Our literature review identified 17 studies and 105 effect sizes across brain and behavioral outcomes. We find that rtfMRI-NF produces a medium-sized effect on neural activity during training (g = .59, 95 % CI [.44, .75], p < .0001), a large-sized effect after training when no neurofeedback is provided (g = .84, 95 % CI [.37, 1.31], p = .005), and small-sized effects for behavioral outcomes (symptoms g = .37, 95 % CI [.16, .58], p = .002; cognition g = .23, 95 % CI [-.33, .78], p = .288). Mixed-effects analyses revealed few moderators. Together, these data suggest a positive impact of rtfMRI-NF on brain and behavioral outcomes, although more research is needed to determine how rtfMRI-NF works, for whom, and under what circumstances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据