4.7 Article

Comparison of diffusion MRI and CLARITY fiber orientation estimates in both gray and white matter regions of human and primate brain

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117692

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 NS095985, R01 MH111444, R21 MH116484, S10 RR026351, P41 EB015891, R01 AG061120-01]
  2. David Mahoney Neuroimaging Program from The Charles A. Dana Foundation - GE Healthcare - Stanford Radiology PHIND Center - Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute at Stanford

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusion MRI is a non-invasive method for mapping brain fiber orientations, and when combined with CLARITY tissue clearing, it offers new insights and opportunities for accurate estimation of neuronal fiber and vasculature orientations. Through the comparison of dMRI and CLARITY results, advancements towards robust multi-modal MRI-CLARITY comparisons are being made.
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) represents one of the few methods for mapping brain fiber orientations non-invasively. Unfortunately, dMRI fiber mapping is an indirect method that relies on inference from measured diffusion patterns. Comparing dMRI results with other modalities is a way to improve the interpretation of dMRI data and help advance dMRI technologies. Here, we present methods for comparing dMRI fiber orientation estimates with optical imaging of fluorescently labeled neurofilaments and vasculature in 3D human and primate brain tissue cuboids cleared using CLARITY. The recent advancements in tissue clearing provide a new opportunity to histologically map fibers projecting in 3D, which represents a captivating complement to dMRI measurements. In this work, we demonstrate the capability to directly compare dMRI and CLARITY in the same human brain tissue and assess multiple approaches for extracting fiber orientation estimates from CLARITY data. We estimate the three-dimensional neuronal fiber and vasculature orientations from neurofilament and vasculature stained CLARITY images by calculating the tertiary eigenvector of structure tensors. We then extend CLARITY orientation estimates to an orientation distribution function (ODF) formalism by summing multiple sub-voxel structure tensor orientation estimates. In a sample containing part of the human thalamus, there is a mean angular difference of 19 degrees +/- 15 degrees between the primary eigenvectors of the dMRI tensors and the tertiary eigenvectors from the CLARITY neurofilament stain. We also demonstrate evidence that vascular compartments do not affect the dMRI orientation estimates by showing an apparent lack of correspondence (mean angular difference = 49 degrees +/- 23 degrees) between the orientation of the dMRI tensors and the structure tensors in the vasculature stained CLARITY images. In a macaque brain dataset, we examine how the CLARITY feature extraction depends on the chosen feature extraction parameters. By varying the volume of tissue over which the structure tensor estimates are derived, we show that orientation estimates are noisier with more spurious ODF peaks for sub-voxels below 30 mu m(3) and that, for our data, the optimal gray matter sub-voxel size is between 62.5 mu m(3) and 125 mu m(3). The example experiments presented here represent an important advancement towards robust multi-modal MRI-CLARITY comparisons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据