4.6 Article

Hardware -based spiking neural network architecture using simplified backpropagation algorithm and homeostasis functionality

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 153-165

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.016

关键词

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs); Hardware-based neural networks; On-chip training; Supervised learning; Homeostasis; Synaptic devices

资金

  1. Brain Korea 21 Plus Project in 2020
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2016M3A7B4909604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a supervised on-chip training method for hardware-based SNNs, achieving high performance through the use of pulse schemes and bias synapse. Experimental results show that the system achieves a recognition rate similar to that of software-based networks in MNIST dataset classification.
Bio-inspired hardware-based spiking neural networks (SNNs) has been suggested as a promising computing system with low power consumption and parallel operation. We propose the supervised on-chip training method approximating the backpropagation algorithm and the pulse scheme applicable to the hardware-based SNNs with the low memory dependency. The performance evaluation through the MNIST data set classification shows that the proposed system achieves a similar recognition rate compared to that of the software-based network. In addition, we also propose novel homeostasis functionality using bias synapse to achieve high performances. The homeostasis functionality well regulates the firing rate of the neurons and improves the recognition rate. The TFT-type flash memory cells are used as synaptic devices. A fully connected two-layer neural network with non-leaky integrate-and-fire (I&F) neurons is used in the simulation. We then investigate the effect of the variation of the hardware-based network on the recognition rate. The simulation results show that the proposed system is resistant to weight variation because on-chip training is adopted. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据