4.8 Review

Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1188-1202

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-00918-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research under Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative [N00014-16-1-2436]
  2. US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-02ER45977]
  3. MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation [DMR-1419807]
  4. NSF [CBET 1851052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in simulation tools and experimental techniques have led to new insights on phonon transport and scattering in materials, as well as the discovery of new thermal materials with ultrahigh or low thermal conductivity. Future directions include engineering phonons towards desired thermal properties in solid-state materials.
Materials with ultrahigh or low thermal conductivity are desirable for many technological applications, such as thermal management of electronic and photonic devices, heat exchangers, energy converters and thermal insulation. Recent advances in simulation tools (first principles, the atomistic Green's function and molecular dynamics) and experimental techniques (pump-probe techniques and microfabricated platforms) have led to new insights on phonon transport and scattering in materials and the discovery of new thermal materials, and are enabling the engineering of phonons towards desired thermal properties. We review recent discoveries of both inorganic and organic materials with ultrahigh and low thermal conductivity, highlighting heat-conduction physics, strategies used to change thermal conductivity, and future directions to achieve extreme thermal conductivities in solid-state materials. This Review provides an overview of experimental and theoretical methods for the understanding of thermal transport, summarizes recent progress in materials with ultrahigh (or low) thermal conductivities, and outlines strategies for the engineering of extreme thermal conductivity materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据