4.8 Article

Implications of the iron oxide phase transition on the interiors of rocky exoplanets

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 121-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-00684-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences
  3. NNSA/DOE through the National Laser Users' Facility Program [DE-NA0002720, DE-NA0003611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of a significant number of extrasolar planets challenges our understanding of the Solar System's planet formation and evolution. Many exoplanets are rocky and more massive than Earth, with complex stratification and rheology in their deep interiors.
The discovery of an extraordinary number of extrasolar planets, characterized by an unexpected variety of sizes, masses and orbits, challenges our understanding of the formation and evolution of the planets in the Solar System and the perception of the Earth as the prototypical habitable world. Many exoplanets appear to be rocky and yet more massive than the Earth, with expected pressures and temperatures of hundreds of gigapascal and thousands of Kelvin in their deep interiors. At these conditions, the properties of bridgmanite and ferropericlase, expected to dominate their mantles, are largely unconstrained, limiting our knowledge of their interior structure. Here we used nano-second X-ray diffraction and dynamic compression to experimentally investigate the atomic structure and density of iron oxide (FeO), one of the end-members of the (Mg,Fe)O ferropericlase solid solution, up to 700 GPa, a pressure exceeding the core-mantle boundary of a 5 Earth masses planet. Our data document the stability of the high-pressure cesium-chloride B2 structure above 300 GPa, well below the pressure required for magnesium oxide (MgO) to adopt the same phase. These observations, complemented by the calculation of the binary MgO-FeO phase diagram, reveal complex stratification and rheology inside large terrestrial exoplanets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据