4.8 Article

Metastability of diamond ramp-compressed to 2 terapascals

期刊

NATURE
卷 589, 期 7843, 页码 532-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03140-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC5207NA27344]
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/J017256/1, EP/S025065/1]
  3. LLNS [B595954]
  4. NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-2020249]
  5. DOE NNSA award [DE-NA0003856]
  6. EPSRC [EP/S025065/1, EP/J017256/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon, the fourth-most prevalent element in the Universe, is essential for life and exists in multiple allotropes. Experimental results show that solid carbon retains its diamond structure even under extreme pressure, providing insights into the structure of carbon-rich exoplanets.
Carbon is the fourth-most prevalent element in the Universe and essential for all known life. In the elemental form it is found in multiple allotropes, including graphite, diamond and fullerenes, and it has long been predicted that even more structures can exist at pressures greater than those at Earth's core(1-3). Several phases have been predicted to exist in the multi-terapascal regime, which is important for accurate modelling of the interiors of carbon-rich exoplanets(4,5.) By compressing solid carbon to 2 terapascals (20 million atmospheres; more than five times the pressure at Earth's core) using ramp-shaped laser pulses and simultaneously measuring nanosecond-duration time-resolved X-ray diffraction, we found that solid carbon retains the diamond structure far beyond its regime of predicted stability. The results confirm predictions that the strength of the tetrahedral molecular orbital bonds in diamond persists under enormous pressure, resulting in large energy barriers that hinder conversion to more-stable high-pressure allotropes(1,2), just as graphite formation from metastable diamond is kinetically hindered at atmospheric pressure. This work nearly doubles the highest pressure at which X-ray diffraction has been recorded on any material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据