4.6 Article

Dry sonication process for preparation of hybrid structures based on graphene and carbon nanotubes usable for chemical sensors

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abe6c9

关键词

reduced graphene oxide; chemiresistor sensor; QCM; gas sensor; multi-walled carbon nanotube

资金

  1. NATO [G5244]
  2. Basque Government [GV IT999-16]
  3. Freistaat Sachsen from German research found [G293]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel dry method based on air sonication process was used to prepare graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrids, avoiding the use of solvents and multistep purification process. By changing the ratio between MWCNTs and G, a range of hybrids with different surface morphologies and chemistries were obtained, showing great potential for designing mass-based sensors for toxic gases and chemiresistors for vapor detection.
The combination of graphene (G) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) creates three-dimensional hybrid structures particularly suitable as next-generation electrical interface materials. Nevertheless, efficient mixing of the nanopowders is challenging, unless previous disaggregation and eventual surface modification of both is reached. To avoid use of solvents and multistep purification process for synthesis of stable G/MWCNTs hybrids, herein, a novel dry method based on an air sonication process was used. Taking advantage from the vigorous turbulent currents generated by powerful ultrasonication in air that induces strong thermal convection or radiation to and from the particles, it simultaneously ensures disentanglement of the large MWCNT bundles and G exfoliation and their only mild surface modifications. By changing the ratio between MWCNTs and G, a range of hybrids was obtained, different in surface morphology and chemistry. These hybrids have shown great potential as sensing material for designing mass-based sensors for toxic gases and chemiresistor for vapors detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据