4.1 Article

Mutagenicity of N -acyloxy- N -alkoxyamides as an indicator of DNA intercalation: The role of fluorene and fluorenone substituents as DNA intercalators

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503299

关键词

Bacterial mutagenicity testing; DNA intercalation; Fluorene intercalation; Fluorenone intercalation; QSAR; 2-Aminofluorene nitrenium ion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding mechanism of fluorenes or fluorenones with DNA depends on the position of substitution and specific chemical side chains, leading to varying intercalation efficacies; some fluorene derivatives do not intercalate into DNA, possibly due to a different insertion mode; the insertion of certain substances is crucial for the detection of frameshift mutations in S. typhimurium TA98.
N-Acyloxy-N-alkoxyamides are direct-acting mutagens in S. typhimurium TA100 and TA98. A reliable QSAR for their activity in TA100 has been developed, which indicates reversible intercalation into the DNA helix through naphthalene substituents. In this paper, we show that fluorene as a substituent does not facilitate intercalation while fluorenone does, although the efficacy is determined by the position of substitution on the fluorenone as well as the N-acyloxy-N-alkoxyamide side chain. Where intercalation is evident, the increased binding to DNA is similar to that of naphthalene and is worth the equivalent of ca four LogP hydrophobicity units. 4-Substituted fluorenones, where the anomeric amide group is in the bay region do not intercalate, which is attributed to the requirement for a weaker edge-on, rather than an end-on intercalation. Mutagencity in S. typhimurium TA98, which detects frame shifts through intercalation, supports the findings. Fluorene appears not to intercalate, which points to the fact that the charge delocalised 2-fluorenylnitrenium ion, the ultimate metabolite from 2aminofluorene (AF) and 2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) is the itercalating agent responsible for frameshift mutations leading to their carcinogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据