4.7 Article

Dust entrainment in galactic winds

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab416

关键词

radiative transfer; dust; extinction; ISM: general; galaxies: ISM

资金

  1. Program 'Rita Levi Montalcini' of the Italian MIUR
  2. NASA [HST-AR-14582]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stellar feedback-driven winds play a crucial role in the galactic ecosystem by regulating star formation and enriching the circumgalactic medium with metals and dust. The amount of ejected dust depends on the sites from where they are launched, with dustier galaxies launching more dust-enriched outflows. Cold and dense gas outflows are significantly more dust enriched compared to hot and tenuous material, providing new insights into the dynamics, structure, and composition of galactic winds.
Winds driven by stellar feedback are an essential part of the galactic ecosystem and are the main mechanism through which low-mass galaxies regulate their star formation. These winds are generally observed to be multiphase with detections of entrained neutral and molecular gas. They are also thought to enrich the circumgalactic medium around galaxies with metals and dust. This ejected dust encodes information about the integrated star formation and outflow history of the galaxy. Therefore it is important to understand how much dust is entrained and driven out of the disc by galactic winds. Here, we demonstrate that stellar feedback is efficient in driving dust-enriched winds and eject enough material to account for the amount of extraplanar dust observed in nearby galaxies. The amount of ejected dust depends on the sites from where they are launched, with dustier galaxies launching more dust-enriched outflows. Moreover, the outflowing cold and dense gas is significantly more dust enriched than the volume filling hot and tenuous material. These results provide an important new insight into the dynamics, structure, and composition of galactic winds and their role in determining the dust content of the extragalactic gas in galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据