4.7 Article

The pristine dwarf-galaxy survey - III. Revealing the nature of the Milky Way globular cluster Sagittarius II

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab604

关键词

Globular Clusters: individual: Sagittarius II; Local Group

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR18-CE31-0017]
  2. CNRS/INSU through the Programme National Galaxies et Cosmologie
  3. CNRS [PICS07708]
  4. Emmy Noether program from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  5. International Space Science Institute, Berne, Switzerland
  6. European Southern Observatory [099.B-0690(A)]
  7. W. M. Keck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new spectroscopic analysis of the faint Milky Way satellite Sagittarius II, confirming it as an old and metal-poor globular cluster of the Milky Way. The low velocity dispersion and metallicity properties were investigated using additional member stars observed, providing insights into the dynamics of the system.
We present a new spectroscopic study of the faint Milky Way satellite Sagittarius II. Using multiobject spectroscopy from the Fibre Large Array Multi-Element Spectrograph, we supplement the data set of Longeard et al. with 47 newly observed stars, 19 of which are identified as members of the satellite. These additional member stars are used to put tighter constraints on the dynamics and the metallicity properties of the system. We find a low velocity dispersion of sigma(SgrII)(v) = 1.7 +/- 0.5 km s(-1), in agreement with the dispersion of Milky Way globular clusters of similar luminosity. We confirm the very metal-poor nature of the satellite ([Fe/H](spectro)(SgrII) = -2.23 +/- 0.07) and find that the metallicity dispersion of Sgr II is not resolved, reaching only 0.20 at the 95 per cent confidence limit. No star with a metallicity below -2.5 is confidently detected. Therefore, despite the unusually large size of the system (r(h) = 35.5(-1.2)(-1.4) pc), we conclude that Sgr II is an old and metal-poor globular cluster of the Milky Way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据