4.7 Article

Gaussian process modelling for improved resolution in Faraday depth reconstruction

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab379

关键词

methods: statistical; techniques: polarimetric; radio continuum: general

资金

  1. UK Newton Fund via the Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) through the Development in Africa with Radio Astronomy (DARA) Big Data project [ST/R001898/1]
  2. Alan Turing Institute AI fellowship [EP/V030302/1]
  3. UK Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  4. National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) Scholarship Program DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE [2018-72190574]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incomplete sampling of data in complex polarization measurements negatively affects RM transfer function and Faraday depth spectra. The novel method presented in this paper, based on Gaussian processes, improves the resolution of reconstructed Faraday depth spectra by inferring missing polarization data.
The incomplete sampling of data in complex polarization measurements from radio telescopes negatively affects both the rotation measure (RM) transfer function and the Faraday depth spectra derived from these data. Such gaps in polarization data are mostly caused by flagging of radio frequency interference and their effects worsen as the percentage of missing data increases. In this paper we present a novel method for inferring missing polarization data based on Gaussian processes (GPs). GPs are stochastic processes that enable us to encode prior knowledge in our models. They also provide a comprehensive way of incorporating and quantifying uncertainties in regression modelling. In addition to providing non-parametric model estimates for missing values, we also demonstrate that GP modelling can be used for recovering rotation measure values directly from complex polarization data, and that inferring missing polarization data using this probabilistic method improves the resolution of reconstructed Faraday depth spectra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据