4.7 Article

Searching for multiple populations in Ruprecht 106

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab443

关键词

stars: abundances; Hertzsprung-Russell and colour-magnitude diagrams; stars: imaging; globular clusters: individual: Ruprecht 106; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. Fondecyt [1170518, 3180210, 1181797]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) [21181653]
  3. Chilean Centro de Excelencia en Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA) BASAL grant [AFB-170002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study confirms that Ruprecht 106 is one of the few globular clusters without multiple populations, in line with previous research. Analysis of spectra and photometry provided information on iron and sodium abundances, as well as orbital characteristics, indicating that it belongs to the inner halo and cannot be accurately associated with any known extragalactic progenitor.
More than a decade has passed since the definition of globular cluster (GC) changed, and now we know that they host multiple populations (MPs). But few GCs do not share that behaviour and Ruprecht 106 is one of these clusters. We analysed 13 member red giant branch stars using spectra in the wavelength range 6120-6405 angstrom obtained through the GIRAFFE Spectrograph, mounted at UT2 telescope at Paranal, as well as the whole cluster using C, V,R, and I photometry obtained through the Swope telescope at Las Campanas. Atmospheric parameters were determined from the photometry to determine Fe and Na abundances. A photometric analysis searching for MPs was also carried out. Both analyses confirm that Ruprecht 106 is indeed one on the few GCs to host simple stellar population, in agreement with previous studies. Finally, a dynamical study concerning its orbits was carried out to analyse the possible extragalactic origin of the cluster. The orbital integration indicates that this GC belongs to the inner halo, while an energy plane shows that it cannot be accurately associated with any known extragalactic progenitor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据