Reconstructing three-dimensional densities from two-dimensional observations of molecular gas

Star formation has long been known to be an inefficient process, in the sense that only a small fraction epsilon(ff) of the mass of any given gas cloud is converted to stars per cloud free-fall time. However, developing a successful theory of star formation will require measurements of both the mean value of epsilon(ff) and its scatter from one molecular cloud to another. Because epsilon(ff) is measured relative to the free-fall time, such measurements require accurate determinations of cloud volume densities. Efforts to measure the volume density from two-dimensional projected data, however, have thus far relied on treating molecular clouds as simple uniform spheres, while their real shapes are likely to be filamentary and their density distributions far from uniform. The resulting uncertainty in the true volume density is likely to be one of the major sources of error in observational estimates of epsilon(ff). In this paper, we use a suite of simulations of turbulent, magnetized, radiative, self-gravitating star-forming clouds in order to examine whether it is possible to obtain more accurate volume density estimates and thereby reduce this error. We create mock observations from the simulations, and show that current analysis methods relying on the spherical assumption likely yield similar to 0.26 dex underestimations and similar to 0.51 dex errors in volume density estimates, corresponding to a similar to 0.13 dex overestimation and a similar to 0.25 dex scatter in epsilon(ff), comparable to the scatter in observed cloud samples. We build a predictive model that uses information accessible in two-dimensional measurements - most significantly, the Gini coefficient of the surface density distribution - to produce estimates of the volume density with similar to 0.3 dex less scatter. We test our method on a recent observation of the Ophiuchus cloud, and show that it successfully reduces the epsilon(ff) scatter.

Automated summary

Star formation is known to be an inefficient process, with accurate measurements of cloud volume densities necessary to estimate the value and scatter of ε(ff). Typical errors in two-dimensional projected data can lead to underestimations in volume density, reducing the accuracy of the study.