4.6 Article

New Insights into the Metabolism of Methyltestosterone and Metandienone: Detection of Novel A-Ring Reduced Metabolites

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26051354

关键词

17α -methyl steroids; long-term metabolites; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; 17-hydroxymethyl-17-methyl-18-nor; D-ring alteration; doping control; metabolism

资金

  1. Freie Universitat Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified new metabolites of metandienone and 17α-methyltestosterone, providing new insights into the metabolism of these synthetic steroids.
Metandienone and methyltestosterone are orally active anabolic-androgenic steroids with a 17 alpha-methyl structure that are prohibited in sports but are frequently detected in anti-doping analysis. Following the previously reported detection of long-term metabolites with a 17 xi-hydroxymethyl-17 xi-methyl-18-nor-5 xi-androst-13-en-3 xi-ol structure in the chlorinated metandienone analog dehydrochloromethyltestosterone (oral turinabol), in this study we investigated the formation of similar metabolites of metandienone and 17 alpha-methyltestosterone with a rearranged D-ring and a fully reduced A-ring. Using a semi-targeted approach including the synthesis of reference compounds, two diastereomeric substances, viz. 17 alpha-hydroxymethyl-17 beta-methyl-18-nor-5 beta-androst-13-en-3 alpha-ol and its 5 alpha-analog, were identified following an administration of methyltestosterone. In post-administration urines of metandienone, only the 5 beta-metabolite was detected. Additionally, 3 alpha,5 beta-tetrahydro-epi-methyltestosterone was identified in the urines of both administrations besides the classical metabolites included in the screening procedures. Besides their applicability for anti-doping analysis, the results provide new insights into the metabolism of 17 alpha-methyl steroids with respect to the order of reductions in the A-ring, the participation of different enzymes, and alterations to the D-ring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据