4.4 Review

Recent Advances in Nano-Bio-Sensing Fabrication Technology for the Detection of Oral Cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 63, 期 5, 页码 339-362

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-021-00306-x

关键词

Prognosis; Nanobiosensors; Nanomaterials; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Oral cancer; Point-of-care

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology-based miniaturized devices have revolutionized pre-clinical and clinical research, particularly in the field of biomarker-based diagnostics for diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, and cancer. The high surface-to-volume ratio and unique properties of nanomaterials have enhanced the detection of clinically relevant biomolecules in bio-fluids, leading to simplified and improved diagnostic devices.
Nanotechnology-based miniaturized devices have been a breakthrough in the pre-clinical and clinical research areas, e.g. drug delivery, personalized medicine. They have revolutionized the discovery and development of biomarker-based diagnostic devices for detection of various diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria and cancer. Nanomaterials (NMs) hold tremendous diagnostic potential due to their high surface-to-volume ratio and quantum confinement phenomenon, improving the detection limit of clinically relevant biomolecules in bio-fluids. Thus, they are helpful in the translation of bench-on platform to point-of-care (POC) screening device. The nanomaterial-based biosensor fabrication technology has also simplified and improved oral cancer (OC) or oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) diagnosis. The fabrication of nano-bio sensors involves application specific modifications of NMs. The unique properties functionalized NMs have augmented their application on the nano-biosensing platform for the detection of clinically relevant biomolecules in bio-fluids. Therefore, this article summarizes the recent advancements in the process of fabrication of nano-biosensors for detection of OC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据