4.7 Article

Effect of Ca(II) on anionic/cationic flotation of magnesite ore

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106778

关键词

Flotation; Dolomite; Magnesite; Quartz; Calcium ion; Adsorption mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874168]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [180106004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research analyzed the effect and mechanism of Ca2+ on the flotation behavior of magnesite, dolomite, and quartz through a series of experiments and tests. The study found that Ca2+ can inhibit mineral flotation by affecting collector adsorption and increasing positive charge on mineral surfaces.
In the flotation of magnesite ore, dolomite dissolution and poor water quality can lead to the accumulation of Ca2+ in backwater and a slurry of flotation, which can give rise to many problems in the separation of magnesite, dolomite and quartz. This research analysed the effect and mechanism of Ca2+ on the anionic/cationic flotation behavior of magnesite, dolomite, and quartz based on flotation tests, zeta potential tests, adsorption tests, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) tests, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) tests. When LKD (a cationic collector) was used as a collector, Ca2+ inhibited all three minerals via adsorption onto the mineral surface and increased positive electricity. When sodium oleate (NaOL) was used as the collector, Ca2+ precipitated with NaOL and adsorbed onto the mineral surface. The adsorption of magnesite and dolomite by precipitation of calcium oleate (CaOL) was found to be weaker than the direct adsorption of NaOL, resulting in the inhibition for magnesite and dolomite, while quartz is activated. In addition, both sodium hexametaphosphate and sodium silicate weakened the effect of Ca2+ by forming compounds. Magnesite and dolomite with NaOL can be strongly depressed by calcium hexametaphosphate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据