4.6 Article

Ti-Cu-Zr-Fe-Sn-Si-Ag-Pd Bulk Metallic Glasses with Potential for Biomedical Applications

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06183-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671008]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1611180, 1809640]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1809640] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ti47Cu38-xZr7.5Fe2.5Sn2Si1Ag2Pdx (x=1, 2, 3, and 4 atomic percent, at. pct) bulk metallic glasses with potential for biomedical applications were fabricated by copper-mold casting, exhibiting high glass-forming ability, relatively low Young's modulus, high compressive strength, and excellent biocompatibility. The addition of Pd improved plasticity and bio-corrosion resistance, making these BMGs promising as biomedical materials.
Ti47Cu38-xZr7.5Fe2.5Sn2Si1Ag2Pdx (x = 1, 2, 3, and 4 atomic percent, at. pct) bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with potential for biomedical applications were fabricated by copper-mold casting. The Ti-based BMGs exhibited high glass-forming ability (GFA) with critical diameters of 4 to 5 mm and a supercooled liquid region over 50 K, though the high contents of Pd slightly decreased the GFA. The additions of 2 and 3 at. pct Pd benefited the improvement of plasticity, and the resultant BMGs showed the relatively low Young's modulus of about 100 GPa, high compressive strengths of 2174 to 2340 MPa, and compressive plastic strain of around 4 pct. The addition of Pd also decreased the passive current density and increased the pitting potential of the Ti-based BMGs in the Hank's solution, leading to the enhanced bio-corrosion resistance of the BMGs. Furthermore, the cell adhesion, viability, and proliferation behaviors revealed that the present Ti-based BMGs possess as good biocompatibility as that of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. These results demonstrated the potential of the Ti-Cu-Zr-Fe-Sn-Si-Ag-Pd BMGs as biomedical materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据