4.5 Review

The clinical and imaging features of cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis A case report and review of the literature

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024687

关键词

cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis; dentate nucleus; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case report describes a rare case of cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) and summarizes the clinical and imaging features of this disease, providing important clues for the diagnosis of CTX.
Rationale: Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) is a rare autosomal recessive lipid deposition disorder characterized by systemic signs and neurological dysfunction. The radiological features of CTX are infrequently summarized in the literature. Patient concerns: We described a 40-year-old male patient who repeatedly engaged in wrestling matches and presented with progressive difficulty in walking and reduced balance with egg-sized, hard, smooth, and painless masses in both ankles. Diagnosis: Neuroimaging examination showed abnormalities both supra- and infratentorially. Bilateral ankle joint magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral xanthomata of the Achilles tendon. The diagnosis was confirmed by the detection of a sterol 27-hydroxylase gene mutation. Interventions: The patient was treated with chenodeoxycholic acid (250 mg 3 times per day). Outcomes: To date, the patient's bilateral xanthomas of the Achilles tendon have begun to diminish, and his neurological impairment has not deteriorated further but has not yet improved. Lessons: We report a rare case of CTX and summarize the clinical and imaging features of this disease. Our findings suggest that the abnormal signals in the dentate nucleus or a long spinal cord lesion involving the central and posterior cord, combined with tendon xanthoma, are important clues for the diagnosis of CTX.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据