4.7 Article

An active meta-layer for optimal flexural wave absorption and cloaking

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107324

关键词

Meta-layer; Absorber; Broadband vibration control; Cloaking

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexural wave propagation is important in thin structures for vibration control. A theoretical limit for flexural wave absorption has been established, and an active meta-layer design has been proposed for optimal wave absorption and vibration control. This approach has the potential to enable alternative solutions for ultrasonic sensing in complex engineering structures.
Flexural wave propagation is common in thin structures and plays a key role in vibrations of structures. Designs of flexural wave absorbers for vibration control have been constantly pursued for decades aiming to find structures that can best balance tradeoffs between small sizes or lightweights and broadband operations. However, their absorption perfor-mance has long been evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the theoretical limit characterizing the relationship between the absorption spectrum and the sample thickness and mass density is missing. In this study, by adopting an inequality as its electromagnetism and acoustics counterparts, the theoretical limit of flexural wave absorption is established. An active meta-layer composed of piezoelectric sensors and actuators with feedback control loops is proposed for optimal wave absorption. We experimentally demonstrate the active meta-layer for optimal broadband wave and vibration control in the beam and acting as skin cloaks of large voids in the plate. The active meta-layer is electrically programmable and scalable without losing stability. The approach proposed sheds light on designs of reconfigurable dynamic control devices and enables alternative solutions for ultrasonic sensing of complex engineering structures. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据